rectangle rectangle rectangle rectangle rectangle rectangle

Unit Two: Studying Africa through the Social Studies

Module Nine: African Economies

Teacher's Edition

Activity Eight: Expand
Globalization and Post-Colonial Economies

As you have learned in other modules on history (Module Seven B), geography (Module Six) and politics (Module Ten), African colonies gained their independence from European colonial powers beginning in 1951 (Libya) and ending with the transition to majority rule in South Africa (1994). Regardless of how and when African countries gained their independence, most countries were economically underdeveloped.

Although each independent African country had unique economic features, most countries inherited similar economic structures from their colonial experience. To understand the economic situation in contemporary post-colonial Africa, it is important to remember the economic structures inherited from the colonial era.

  1. Most African economies at independence were centered on the production and export of a single commodity, be it agricultural or mineral. (click here to view table of Basic Economic Data) Economists label economies that are dependent on a single commodity as mono-economies. You have learned that in order for economies to develop, specialization and diversification are essential. Independent African governments had to develop strategies for economic diversification and specialization. This was not an easy task given that the colonial economic systems were not oriented to diversification.
  2. Most African countries inherited under-developed commercial, transportation, and communication infrastructures. Economic diversification and growth is dependent in part on developed networks of communication and transportation that facilitate the easy movement of goods, services, capital and labor.
  3. You know from your study of the factors of economic production that one of the most important factors of economic production and economic growth is people. All production depends on human labor. Specialized production is dependent on a skilled and educated workforce. However, most colonial governments spent very little money on schooling. Consequently at independence, African countries faced a severe shortage of skilled people, an absolute necessity for economic growth and development. To give just one example, at independence in 1960, the Congo (Democratic Republic), a country the size of the United States east of the Mississippi River, had fewer than 20 college graduates!

These are some of the economic realities confronting African governments at independence. In addition to these harsh realities, African countries wanted desperately to address legitimate needs and aspirations of their citizens. As you will remember, central concerns of the nationalist movements (Module Seven B and Module Ten) were the lack of economic opportunity and social justice. Pro-independence nationalist leaders, responding to the aspirations of the people, demanded greater access to schooling, more adequate health care and housing, safe drinking water, and economic opportunities, just to list the most important demands. Having championed these demands, the first post-colonial governments had to make an attempt to deliver on these aspirations. However, meeting these aspirations would necessitate huge government expenditures, which in turn would be dependent on government revenues. Government revenues come primarily from taxing the productive sectors of the national economy. So, it comes back to economic growth and development. To meet the legitimate aspirations of the people, economic growth and development are essential.


POST-COLONIAL GLOBAL CONNECTIONS

Post colonial global connections.


Your Turn
You Decide

On achieving political independence, African governments clearly had to develop and enact policies that would stimulate economic growth and which would help citizens meet their social and economic aspirations.

Problem One:

Following the advice of many international economic experts, including professionals from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, leaders of African countries established policies aimed at strengthening their economies through diversification However, there are a number of different strategies which governments can take in attempting to promote economic development. In the 1960s and 1970s, international economists promoted two competing strategies for generating economic growth and development.

Strategy One:

Strategy Two:

Proponents of an import-substitution plan, disagreed with this approach. They asserted that dependence on the export of raw materials would perpetuate the economic dependency of African countries on a unstable and unfair international system, which buys raw materials cheaply and sells industrial goods at high prices.

African governments were not faced with easy choices. What policy do you think you would have followed if you were an African leader at independence?

Note to teachers: We would suggest that you have the class complete this exercise in small groups. Divide the class into at least four small groups. You know your students best, so please divide them into the size group you feel will be most effective for discussion. Assign each of the four groups one of the following tasks:

Give the groups 10 minutes to compile their lists. As a combined class, have each group present its lists. The idea of this exercise is to provide the students with the opportunity for critical thinking. Students should come away from this activity with an appreciation of how complex and difficult it is to make economic decisions and policies.

Problem Two:

Once African governments made the decision on which model of economic growth to follow, they were confronted with an additional economic dilemma of how to fund/finance their development plan. Large infusions of capital would be needed for either the development of import substitution or export generating industries.

The question of funding economic projects was closely tied to the issue of ownership of economic resources. Whoever owned economic resources would have primary responsibility for raising money to finance the project under consideration. By the same token, those who owned productive resources would control the profits generated by the industry.

In the 1960s, African governments had a number of different options for raising capital to fund development that were directly connected to issues of ownership.

  1. Private Enterprise: Private enterprise (capitalism) is a system in which economic resources, such as land, natural resources, commerce, and industry, are privately owned by individuals or groups of individuals. If African countries at independence were to follow a private enterprise strategy, resources such as land and minerals would belong to individuals or privately owned companies. In private enterprise, companies or individuals owning resources are responsible for raising capital (funds) necessary to begin or expand production. Colonialism, of course, left most African countries with little local capital. Consequently, if a free-enterprise strategy were to be implemented, African governments and local businesses would have to raise capital from outside the country, primarily from international businesses located in Europe, Japan, and North America. To attract international investments, African governments would need to have policies attractive to potential investors. For example, property rights would be guaranteed and companies would have the right to do whatever they wished with their profits, including sending them out of the country. This approach raised some concerns. Would international businesses be willing to re-invest some of their profits within the country, or would they send most of their profits out of the country? Would these businesses be willing to invest in their workforce by supporting education, health care, and housing? Or would their primary concern be the making of profit? How different would this system be from the colonial economic system that was primarily interested in the export of raw materials and not in diversified development?

  2. State Directed/Control: A second option available to African leaders at independence was that of state control. A system of state control would give the state ownership of a country's natural resources. This system would allow the new government to develop an economic plan that was in line with what it felt was in the best interest of the country. In this system, the government would be responsible for raising the capital necessary for the development of new, or expansion of existing, businesses. How would the government raise capital?

    There were four potential sources of revenues. First, the governments could try to raise funds for investment through taxation. However, since African economies at independence were underdeveloped, there was little potential for raising necessary funds through taxation. Second, governments could borrow money from international lenders, either private banks or from non-private institutions like the World Bank. However, given that banks are a product of the free enterprise system, banks might be reluctant to loan large sums of monies to fund state controlled projects or businesses. Third, African governments could appeal to richer countries to provide them with grants (gifts of money targeted at a specific project) to help fund economic projects. While a number of Asian, European, and North American governments were willing to provide some development assistance, would these countries be willing to supple the amount of monies needed to stimulate economic development? Fourth, African governments could encourage international businesses to undertake joint business ventures in which the business would provide capital and expertise, while governments would provide natural resources and labor.

  3. Mixed Economy: A third option open to African governments was the development of a mixed economic plan, which combined elements of private ownership and control with elements of state ownership and control. Under such a plan, the government would identify certain areas of the economy in which private ownership and enterprise would be encouraged. Similarly, areas of the economy would be set aside for state control. This option would allow the government to attempt to attract capital from a wide variety of sources: international businesses, bank loans, direct grants from richer countries.

It's your turn again to imagine yourself as a leader in an African country just after independence. You have to develop a policy for investment and ownership based on what you have learned.

Teacher's note: Once again, given the rather complex and difficult nature of the economic materials, it is probably best to do this exercise in small groups.

Divide the class into three groups. Assign each of the groups one of the following positions:

Group One: Based on what you have learned, list the reasons that would support the development of a Free Enterprise strategy of ownership and raising capital.

Group Two: Based on what you have learned, list the reasons that would support the development of a state/government controlled strategy of ownership and raising capital.

Group Three: Based on what you have learned, list the reasons that would support the development of a "mixed economy" strategy of ownership and raising capital.

Give the groups 10 minutes to compile their lists. As a combined class, have each group present its lists. The idea of this exercise is to provide the students with the opportunity for critical thinking. Students should come away from this activity with an appreciation of how complex and difficult it is to make economic decisions and policies.

Alternative class project: If you would like to spend more time with your students investigating economic decision making, you could assign each group specific African country to research using web and/or library resources. The groups could look at the specifics of each country and develop a plan for diversification and investment.

Looking back over the past forty years of since the end of colonialism, it is clear that African governments took many different approaches to promoting economic development. Most of the governments of Africa's 56 countries followed a mixed approach to development. That is, they tried a combination of import substitution and diversification of exports. To fund these endeavors most governments did not follow either a strict free enterprise or state directed approach to funding development, but used a combination of strategies to foster economic development and growth.

How successful were these economic strategies? The answer to this question will depend in part on the data ("facts and figures") that you use to answer the question.

One way to measure economic growth is tracing changes in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). You will remember that the GDP measures in money terms the value of all goods and services produced in a country.

Take a look at Table One (above) and Tables Two and Three. Table Two records the growth of GNP among all African countries from 1980 through 1997. Table Three measures the GNP per capita. That is, the total GNP divided by the population of the country.

Study Table Two carefully and answer the following questions in your Exploring Africa Web Journal (you may want to compare the data this table with the data in Table One) :

  1. Which African country has had the highest rate of GDP growth over the past twenty years? Look back at the map that records the primary products and exports of African countries. What is/are the primary exports of this country?
    Botswana, whose major export is diamonds.
  2. List the countries whose GDP has grown by more than five percent over the past ten years.
    Botswana, Equatorial Guinea, Ghana, Guinea, Lesotho, Mauritius, Mozambique, Uganda.
  3. Look at the earlier map that identifies natural resources and exports. Identify three countries that export petroleum. How rapidly did their GDP grow over the last twenty years?
  4. Look at the earlier map that identifies natural resources. Identify five countries whose primary export is an agricultural product. How rapidly did their GDP grow over the last twenty years?
  5. Based on the information you retrieved in answering the previous questions, what relationship, if any, is there between primary export and economic growth, as measured by GDP?
    The data recorded on these tables is inconclusive on this question. Botswana, the fastest growing economy in Africa, is a diamond exporter and has clearly benefited from its mineral wealth. On the other hand, agriculturally based economies such as Mozambique, Uganda, and Ghana, have had above average growth rates.

Study Table Three carefully and answer the following questions in your Exploring Africa Web Journal:

  1. Which African country has the highest per capita GDP?
    Oil producing Libya and the tiny islands state of Seychelles, whose economy is dependent on tourism have the highest GDP per capita.
  2. Make a list of the African countries whose per capita GDP more than $500 per year in 1997.
    Algeria, Botswana, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Comoros, Republic of the Congo, Cote d'Ivoire, Egypt, Gabon, Guinea, Lesotho, Mauritius, Morocco, Namibia, Seychelles, South Africa, Swaziland, Tunisia, Zimbabwe
  3. Look at the data in Table Three (Per capita GDP). In how many African countries did the per capita GDP stay the same or actually decline over the past twenty years?
    39 countries!
    Most of these countries experienced growth in their GDP but a decline in their per capita GDP. How do you explain this difference?
    There are two factors that students should pick up on: overall slow economic growth that did not keep up with high population growth.
  4. Based on the information contained in these two tables, how would you describe the overall growth and African economies over the past twenty years as measured by GDP?
    With a few notable exceptions, economic growth in Africa has been very slow over the past two decades.

What explanation can be given for the economic performance of African countries? Economic structures and practices put in place during colonialism may offer some explanation. The policy decisions made by African officials may also be partially responsible for economic performance. However, to gain a better understanding of the economics of contemporary Africa, it is important take into consideration the impact of globalization.

Go to Activity Nine

Home | Curriculum | Activities | Countries | Events